Aims and objectives: To provide a narrative synthesis of research findings on instruments or tools designed to aid assessment of patient capacity to consent to treatment.
Background: Capacity assessment is of significant priority within health care as a finding of incapacity is a vehicle for the removal of many of an individual's fundamental rights. Despite there being many instruments and tools available to aid health professionals in the assessment of patient capacity, there are no standardised guidelines from professional bodies that inform the assessment of mental capacity.
Design: Integrative review.
Method: Primary studies of instruments or tools concerning assessment of patient capacity to consent to treatment, published in English in peer-reviewed journals between January 2005-December 2010, were included in the review. Review papers of capacity assessment instruments were included for years including and prior to 2006.
Results: Nineteen instruments were found which assess patient capacity to consent. Key themes were identified in terms of capacity domains assessed, psychometric properties, instrument implementation, patient populations studied and instrument versus clinician judgement.
Conclusion: Despite a plethora of capacity assessment instruments and tools available, only a small number of instruments were found to have demonstrated both reliability and validity. Further research is required to improve the validity of existing capacity assessment instruments.
Relevance to clinical practice: Increased attention to patient rights and autonomy arguably places a considerable burden on healthcare professionals to facilitate capacity assessments across a continuum of health care. Despite a plethora of capacity assessment instruments and tools being available to healthcare professionals, a comprehensive assessment requires time and is often difficult in the acute care setting. A strictly formulaic approach to the assessment of capacity is unlikely to capture specific individual nuances; therefore, capacity assessment instruments should support, but not replace, experienced clinical judgement.
Keywords: assessment; competence; consent; decision-making; mental capacity.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Goldsmith L, Skirton H, Webb C. Goldsmith L, et al. J Adv Nurs. 2008 Dec;64(6):549-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04829.x. J Adv Nurs. 2008. PMID: 19120568 Review.
Dunn LB, Nowrangi MA, Palmer BW, Jeste DV, Saks ER. Dunn LB, et al. Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Aug;163(8):1323-34. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.8.1323. Am J Psychiatry. 2006. PMID: 16877642 Review.
Lamont S, Jeon YH, Chiarella M. Lamont S, et al. Nurs Ethics. 2013 Sep;20(6):684-707. doi: 10.1177/0969733012473011. Epub 2013 Mar 20. Nurs Ethics. 2013. PMID: 23515254 Review.
Jeste DV, Palmer BW, Appelbaum PS, Golshan S, Glorioso D, Dunn LB, Kim K, Meeks T, Kraemer HC. Jeste DV, et al. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007 Aug;64(8):966-74. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.8.966. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007. PMID: 17679641
Mallardi V. Mallardi V. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005. PMID: 16602332 Italian.
Marazia C, Rucci P, Fangerau H, Voßberg D, Rolfes V, Iozzino L, Iommi M, Gosek P, Heitzman J, Ferrari C, Macis A, Markiewicz I, Picchioni M, Salize HJ, Stompe T, Wancata J, Appelbaum PS, de Girolamo G. Marazia C, et al. Schizophr Bull Open. 2022 Jun 16;3(1):sgac037. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac037. eCollection 2022 Jan. Schizophr Bull Open. 2022. PMID: 39144784 Free PMC article.
Morena D, Lippi M, Di Fazio N, Delogu G, Rinaldi R, Frati P, Fineschi V. Morena D, et al. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 May 5;60(5):764. doi: 10.3390/medicina60050764. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024. PMID: 38792947 Free PMC article. Review.
Behrens LL, Anderson HL, Kowalchik KH, Mogle J, Roman Jones J, Van Haitsma K, Hodgson N, Boltz M. Behrens LL, et al. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2024 Apr-Jun 01;38(2):168-177. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000616. Epub 2024 Apr 23. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2024. PMID: 38651790
Hinckley J, Jayes M. Hinckley J, et al. Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 Oct 20;4:1236534. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1236534. eCollection 2023. Front Rehabil Sci. 2023. PMID: 37928752 Free PMC article. Review.
Hofstad T, Husum TL, Rugkåsa J, Hofmann BM. Hofstad T, et al. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 10;22(1):1507. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08798-2. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022. PMID: 36496384 Free PMC article.